Click on Image to Magnify
# 1 536 items = 34.4%
# 4 148 = 9.5%
# 9 148 = 9.5%
# 6 136 = 8.7%
# 7 109 = 7.0%
# XI 109 = 7.0%
# 5 87 = 5.6%
# 8 84 = 5.4%
# 3 83 = 5.3%
# 14 54 = 3.5%
# 2 31 = 2.0%
# 13 22 = 1.4%
# 15 7 = 0.4%
# 31 2 = 0.1%
# 16 0 = 0%
# 17 0 = 0%
A notable feature of the Numeral Cancellations is that though they are found on letters, cards and banderoles, their use is confined almost entirely to cancelling low value stamps so that a numeral cancel on a stamp above 20 kopecks in face value is really very uncommon.
Added 31 January 2015: Kaj Hellman kindly contributes the following Comments from Helsinki:
It
is very interesting to see these statistics about SPB numeral postmarks !
Most probably nobody has ever done it before.
I
had a collection of these already when in secondary school (that is a long time
ago !) . Then I even exhibited them in the AMPHILEX 1967 youth class. I
had never found the highest numbers , but my dad found the number 16 on a
fragment in an antiquarian shop - that was a lucky day ! This
number 16 is perhaps the rarest. I believe that Oleg Fabergé did not have
it. To see in these statistics that #14 is in scarcity so close to
#3 , #5 and #8 is a bit astonishing. I was always
thinking that I can always find the numbers between 1 - XI , even in quantities, but that 2, 13, 14 and 15 are the difficult
ones . And the highest numbers 16, 17 and 31 are rarities .
There
was plenty of mail between St.Petersburg and Finland . Therefore
these numbers can still easily be found here on cards and covers. Also
they have been a very popular field of collecting among Finnish
collectors - especially because there are so many different types.
By the way, Numbers 16 and 31 I will have in my big March Auction in Helsinki!
Kaj
Hellman
I find the clustering in these numbers fascinating. Why would types 4, 9 and 6 be equally common? Why would types 7 and XI? And types 5, 8 and 3?
ReplyDeleteIn about 30 years of collecting I've owned one 31, seen two others and never owned or seen a 16 or 17 so my experience matches that of M. Vigneron.